Still, some had a sense of trepidation as the larger case moves on. Rebecca Hart Holder, president of Reproductive Equity Now, a Massachusetts-based advocacy group, said it is impossible to read the tea leaves, given the court’s existing decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade and antiabortion groups’ attempts at a national ban on the procedure.

We asked ourselves what we could do as a state to protect people’s reproductive freedom here in Massachusetts. We were ready with a plan of action when the ruling came down on a Friday evening of a holiday weekend.

"With this stockpiled supply of mifepristone, our providers can continue to offer the gold standard of medication abortion care to thousands of people throughout the state, regardless of what a judge in Texas says," said Reproductive Equity Now President Rebecca Hart Holder. "Today, Massachusetts is sending a clear message that we will fight back against attempts to reach across our borders and restrict access to care."

The doses of mifepristone purchased by UMass Amherst are enough "to ensure sufficient coverage in the state for more than one year," according to a statement from Reproductive Equity Now.

Rebecca Hart Holder, executive director of Boston-based Reproductive Equity Now, said Kacsymryk’s ruling “has no basis in science, medicine, or justice.”

“Everything is on the table with our response, quite frankly,” Hart Holder said.

“We need to be very clear-eyed about how devastating this decision could be if it is upheld by the highest” court, said Rebecca Hart Holder, president of Reproductive Equity Now, a Massachusetts-based advocacy group.

Nothing changes for at least the next week, because of the Texas seven-day stay, but “it’s hard to predict what will happen on day eight,” said Rebecca Hart Holder, head of Boston-based Reproductive Equity Now.

The Texas ruling “is playing with our lives in a really disgusting and disingenuous way,” said Hart Holder. “People are not going to know what’s legal, what’s not legal, when they can access and where they can go to access care.”

Reproductive Equity Now, a Boston-based nonprofit organization that advocates for abortion access, said in a statement that medication abortion accounts for nearly 50 percent of abortions in Massachusetts and more than 50 percent of abortions nationwide, and has a 99 percent safety rate.

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey included critical reproductive health care funds in her FY2023 supplemental budget.

In the face of fascist attempts to control our reproduction and gender expression while also increasing state surveillance that violates our privacy, it’s important to recognize the safe havens in our midst. Here is what some U.S. states are doing to ensure that access to abortion and gender-affirming care is legal and secure within their borders.

The Massachusetts State Senate on Thursday, March 9 passed a $368.7 million supplemental budget for Fiscal Year 2023.

With access to a widely-used abortion medication on the line, Massachusetts is trying to walk and chew gum at the same time – warning local pharmacies that they must continue supplying the medications, while gearing up for a potentially disruptive ruling out of Texas that could throw abortion care systems into chaos.

“We have to recognize that Roe was never a full guarantee of access to the full spectrum of reproductive health care,” said Claire Teylouni, the director of government affairs for New England-based Reproductive Equity Now.

"It was part of the anti-abortion movement's plan to ban abortion nationwide, and now anti-abortion extremists are trying to reach across state borders into states that have made it clear they will protect abortion access and to ban and restrict care," Hart Holder said.

Abortion rights advocates have been warning forever that antichoice zealots would not stop at overturning Roe v Wade last summer, a reversal that cleared the way for bans in roughly half the country. The extremists have always wanted a national ban, and one that goes beyond surgical abortion to medication-assisted abortion.

Massachusetts providers are preparing for the impact of a Texas antiabortion lawsuit that could limit access to medication-assisted abortion, a major change that would mark the first time abortion access would be restricted in the state since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last June.

The Massachusetts Legislature is trying, once again, to create a state-funded public education campaign about crisis pregnancy centers, antiabortion facilities accused of posing as reproductive health care clinics.